• Vol. 51 No. 9, 586–588
  • 26 September 2022

Antiphospholipid and other autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients: A Singapore series

281



0 Citing Article
281 Views
57 Downloads

Download PDF

Dear Editor,

Thrombosis is an unexpected complication of COVID-19 initially reported in 3 patients from China.1 These patients tested positive for immunoglobulin (Ig) A anticardiolipin (ACA), IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) and IgA aβ2GPI, though not for the lupus anticoagulant (LAC).

In a Singapore study comprising 47,527 patients, 19 (0.04%) developed acute cerebral arterial and 4 (0.01%) developed venous thrombosis.2 Only 3 patients in the former group and 1 in the latter group were found to have LAC, ACA or aβ2GPI (personal communication). In a meta-analysis of 28 studies, among 2,928 intensive-care COVID-19 patients, deep venous thrombosis occurred in 16.1% and pulmonary embolism in 12.6%.3

We sought to identify autoantibodies (antinuclear antibody [ANA], rheumatoid factor [RF], ACA and aβ2GPI) in the serum of COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital from 21 April to 2 September 2020. During this period, the original virus strain was prevalent and all COVID-19 patients were managed in the hospital. Leftover serum samples from completed routine tests in the laboratory were used. This work is approved by the institutional review board (DSRB 2020/00741).

Healthy control sera had been collected before the pandemic for our biobank. These were from 100 volunteers (80% men) comprising Filipinos (50%), Chinese (30%), Malays (10%) and Indians (10%).

The ANA, IgA and IgM RF, and IgG and IgA aβ2GPI kits were obtained from EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG (Lübeck, Germany). The IgG and IgA ACA kits were from Inova Diagnostics Inc (San Diego, US). The method for detection was indirect immunofluorescence for ANA, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the rest. Reference values were: ANA <1/80 titre; IgA and IgM RF, IgG and IgA ACA, and IgG and IgA aβ2GPI, <20 units/mL.

There were 52 COVID-19 patients (92.3% men). The mean age was 43.8±13.3 years, ranging 22.5–95.5 years. There were 16 Bangladeshis, 24 Indians, 9 Chinese, 2 Malays and 1 Burmese. Based on clinical record charting and chest imaging, we categorised the severity of COVID-19 infection into 3 categories: asymptomatic, mid/moderate and severe/critical. For symptomatic patients, the interval between the first symptoms and blood draw was 14.3±18.6 days (range 3–93 days, 95% confidence interval 8.1–20.4).

Twenty-one patients experienced no respiratory symptoms (including 1 hospitalised for aortic thrombus), 17 developed upper respiratory tract infection, and 14 developed pneumonia. One patient died of pneumonia. Four patients (3 with pneumonia and 1 otherwise asymptomatic) were considered to have COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, based on emerging literature at the time.4

There is statistically significant higher prevalence of IgA RF, IgG ACA, IgA ACA, IgG aβ2GPI and IgA aβ2GPI in our COVID-19 patients compared with healthy controls (Table 1). The odds ratios are highest for IgA aβ2GPI, IgG ACA and IgG aβ2GPI. There is no difference in the prevalence of ANA and IgM RF. Almost two-thirds of the patients (63.4%) and 11% of the controls developed at least ACA or aβ2GPI antibodies. There was no association between disease severity and presence or the concentration of any autoantibodies (Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of the autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients and healthy controls

Four patients developed arterial thrombosis—2 with cerebral infarcts, 1 with right suprarenal aortic thrombosis, and 1 with abdominal aorta and right external iliac artery thrombosis. Separately, 1 patient developed pulmonary embolism. These occurred acutely, apart from the cerebral infarcts that developed 1- and 3-month post-recovery. Per the aforementioned sequence, the first patient tested positive for IgA ACA; the second IgA RF; the third IgG ACA, IgG aβ2GPI and IgA aβ2GPI; and the fourth IgA ACA, IgG aβ2GPI, IgA aβ2GPI and IgA RF. The patient with pulmonary embolism tested positive for ANA and IgA aβ2GPI. Four of the 5 patients tested positive for ≥1 antiphospholipid antibodies.

This controlled study refines our understanding of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19. We showed that COVID-19 patients are highly likely to develop antiphospholipid antibodies compared with healthy controls. Autoantibodies were not generated across the board as the prevalence of ANA and RF IgM positivity was no different between patients and controls.

The lack of association between disease severity and the development of autoantibodies is consistent with some reports5 and contrasts with others.6 A meta-analysis of 21 studies completed in January 2021 concluded that the presence of ACA (IgM or IgG) and anti-β2GPI (IgM or IgG) was significantly more prevalent in critically ill COVID-19 patients, although a source of bias could be that non-critically ill patients were included in only 3 studies.7

Viral infections in the acute stage are associated with the generation of autoantibodies; these antibodies tend to be transient and do not cause pathology. The relative risk of developing ACA was 10.5% in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus, 6.3% with hepatitis C (HCV), 4.2% with hepatitis B (HBV) and 10.9% with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Only HCV infection was associated with aβ2GPI antibodies. Thrombosis occurs in HBV and HCV patients only.8 Severe acute respiratory syndrome, caused by the closely related SARS-CoV virus, is also known to be associated with autoantibodies.9 A review suggested that although antiphospholipid antibodies may be found in COVID-19 patients, they are not closely related to thrombotic events.10

The strengths of our study are the classification of patients by disease severity, and comparison with healthy controls. The weaknesses are the small number of patients in our convenience sample, which may have contributed to bias. The use of anticoagulation in our patients could have reduced the incidence of clinically detected thrombosis. Our findings may not be generalisable to infection by subsequent variants, such as the Delta and Omicron strains.

In conclusion, almost two-thirds of the COVID-19 patients in our cohort developed antiphospholipid autoantibodies regardless of the disease severity. These autoantibodies are not associated with thrombosis in COVID-19.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by grants from the Tan Tock Seng Hospital Community Fund and from the Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology of the same hospital.

REFERENCES

  1. Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e38.
    2. Koh JS, De Silva DA, Quek AML, et al. Neurology of COVID-19 in Singapore. J Neurol Sci 2020;418:117118.
    3. Jenner WJ, Kanji R, Mirsadraee S, et al. Thrombotic complications in 2928 patients with COVID-19 treated in intensive care: a systematic review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2021;51:595-607.
    4. Jayarangaiah A, Kariyanna PT, Chen X, et al. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy: an exacerbated immunothrombosis response. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2020;26:1076029620943293.
    5. Karahan S, Erol K, Yuksel RC, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19-associated pneumonia patients in intensive care unit. Mod Rheumatol 2021;32:163-8.
    6. Bertin D, Brodovitch A, Beziane A, et al. Anticardiolipin IgG autoantibody level is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 severity. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1953-5.
    7. Taha M, Samavati L. Antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review. RMD Open 2021;7:e001580.
    8. Abdel-Wahab N, Talathi S, Lopez-Olivo MA, et al. Risk of developing antiphospholipid antibodies following viral infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lupus 2018;27:572-83.
    9. Yang YH, Huang YH, Chuang YH, et al. Autoantibodies against human epithelial cells and endothelial cells after severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus infection. J Med Virol 2005;77:1-7.
    10. Favaloro EJ, Henry BM, Lippi G. COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies: time for a reality check? Semin Thromb Hemost 2022;48:72-92.