• Vol. 44 No. 5
  • 15 May 2015

Long-term Outcomes of Medical Therapy Versus Coronary Revascularisation in Patients with Intermediate Stenoses Guided by Pressure Wire

13



 Citing Article
13 Views
4 Downloads

Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study aimed to examine the long-term clinical outcomes of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population in an Asian tertiary centre.

Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent FFR measurement for intermediate coronary lesions in our centre from June 2002 to December 2009 were enrolled. A threshold of FFR ≤0.75 was used for revascularisation. All the patients were prospectively followed-up for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation (TVR) and stent thrombosis.

Results: Based on FFR measurement, 368 (57%) patients were treated medically while 278 (43%) underwent revascularisation. At a mean follow-up duration of 29.7 ± 16 months, 53 (14.4%) patients in the medical therapy group and 32 (11.5%) patients in the revascularised group experienced MACE (P = 0.282). There were no statistical differences in all the clinical endpoints between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Medical therapy based on FFR measurement is associated with low incidences of MACE at long-term follow-up.


Although coronary angiography has been used as the “gold standard” imaging technique for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, it is essentially a lumenogram that offers no information on the functional significance of a coronary lesion. It is difficult to define the haemodynamic significance of a stenosis from the angiogram, especially in intermediate lesions (diameter stenosis of 50% to 70%).

This article is available only as a PDF. Please click on “Download PDF” on top to view the full article.